Napster to charge access fees, in order to pay royalties in the hope that
the RIAA doesn't have its guts for garters. Wonder whether they'll do this by
charging fees for usernames/passwords with the existing protocol, or by
"de-commoditising" the protocol and forcing people to use the closed-source
Windows client? (Hope it's not the latter; other than not being able to use
a decent operating system, clients for proprietary protocols often take
advantage of this to send marketable user information back to their masters.)