Posted by: Jimbob | http://www.the-fix.org | Tue Oct 23 05:27:43 2001
The problem is that Pakistan, a major player in this conflict, does not like the northern alliance at all! The day Pakistan's president had that big press conference before the attacks started, he made a big point that the war <i>must not benefit the Northern Alliance</i>. If we're wiping out the Taliban, but Pakistan won't let the NA come into power, who's going to run the country? Could we see some kind of post WWII scenario as happened in Germany, where various countries took over the recovery of different parts of the country? And if so, and Pakistan is a big player, what's India (and indeed Afghanistans other neighbours to the north) going to think about that?
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Ben | http://leviathan.weblogs.com | Mon Oct 22 17:49:04 2001
You're being a bit harsh: don't forget the Alliance also includes the remnants of the previous Communist government, who were very liberal as far as women's rights go (something you never hear much about, strangely).