He said Goodwill officials began asking him about his beliefs the day after the televised MDCC debate. Three days later, they told him that ``because of your views on the U.S. government, you are a disruptive force and cannot work here any longer. Get your things and go,'' Italie said.
(Perhaps he should be grateful he's not in Indonesia or somewhere, where the economically expedient means of dealing with subversive employees is to enlist the services of the local right-wing death squads.) (via Unknown News)
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Tue Nov 6 13:04:00 2001
Well, if working for a Liberal Party campaign, you could always do what Mark Mothersbaugh did with his ad jingles, and sneak in hidden messages.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: TOBY | http://www.telegraphics.com.au | Tue Nov 6 01:06:15 2001
For someone holding those views, didn't it seem hypocritical to be working for a company with that "mission" (Army contracts)? I often think my own employment - which is often in service of ugly multinationals - runs against my principles... What do you do, for instance, if you are asked to work for a repugnant cause? (e.g. a Liberal Party campaign)? Resign? Refuse? There's little scope for conscientious objection - or any manifestation of conscience - in business. But I find it curious that this particular communist was happy to work for The Man.