The Null Device

Looks like Australia is getting its own "anti-terrorist" legislation, giving sweeping powers to intelligence agencies and the authorities, including the power to jail people for possession of any artifact used in terrorism. The legislation will also be useful against dissident groups (such as anti-detention-centre protesters). If you want to do something about it, see this page and contact your local ALP senator. Hopefully Labor will have been sufficiently stung at the polls to not unquestioningly parrot the dogma of "national security" in the hope of not being "unpatriotic".

There are 3 comments on "":

Posted by: Jimbob
http://the-fix.org
Tue May 7 00:59:15 2002

It would be good if that link had more useful information about what it is in the laws I should oppose (when you write to politicians you have to be as explicit and knowledgable as possible, and not just be some Resistance wanker chanting "STOP THE WAR"). I guess I'll have to have a look at the bill myself. You've got to pick out specific problems, not just whinge about the overall "vibe" of the bill.

Posted by: Jimbob
http://the-fix.org
Tue May 7 04:09:40 2002

I've had a good look at the amendments, and I can't find TOO much to complain about. The proposed definition of terrorism for the Criminal code, explicitly states that terrorism should NOT include property destruction, political protest, causing public health dangers, industrial action, tampering with telecommunications or transport systems etc. etc. In other words, if these definitions are adhered to, all the things Americans have defined as terrorism (everything from music piract to environmental protest) would explicitly NOT be defined as terrorism under Australian law. I went about writing a big letter, but I've realised that most of it is really crap because the legislation covers everything I was worried about (except maybe the 48 hour detention thing).

Posted by: Jimbob
http://the-fix.org
Tue May 7 04:18:22 2002

I've had a good look at the amendments, and I can't find TOO much to complain about. The proposed definition of terrorism for the Criminal code, explicitly states that terrorism should NOT include property destruction, political protest, causing public health dangers, industrial action, tampering with telecommunications or transport systems etc. etc. In other words, if these definitions are adhered to, all the things Americans have defined as terrorism (everything from music piract to environmental protest) would explicitly NOT be defined as terrorism under Australian law. I went about writing a big letter, but I've realised that most of it is really crap because the legislation covers everything I was worried about (except maybe the 48 hour detention thing).

Want to say something? Do so here.

Display name:
URL:(optional)
To prove that you are not a bot,
please enter the text in the image on the right
in the field below it.

Your Comment:

Remember my details.

Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.

Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.