(Which makes one wonder what the '90s-inspired artists in a decade's time will be like. Grunge revivalists, perhaps, or 'old-style' commercial techno-pop with 909s and 303s in the mix; only done as an ironic reference, with a 'teens sensibility?)
Btw, while I'm on the topic, I think the word "electroclash" sounds rather daft; as it (i.e., Fischerspooner, Ladytron, Felix Da Housecat) doesn't sound particularly clashy, or indeed like The Clash. I prefer Mag/Tif's term "neo-electro". Then again, most music-journalist-coined genre names initially sound silly and ill-fitting (e.g., "goth", "shoegazer", "britpop", etc.)
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Tue Aug 27 13:14:59 2002
We've had "post-ironic" for years now. (Though the "post-" may not mean "after irony", but "postmodern/ironic", implying an extra level of preemptive detachment from the subject matter.)
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com/vm/ | Tue Aug 27 15:02:28 2002
yeah, focr ouse. But methinx we ought to start throwing neo-ironic around a bit.
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com/vm/ | Tue Aug 27 15:03:19 2002
i mean "of course". nyeh, my typing fingers are becoming dislexic.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com/vm/ | Tue Aug 27 13:07:52 2002
What, a newer one than the one with the lurid tongue on the cover that's been out here for a few months? Who cares.
Dunno, "electroclash" seems to fit for me, and it's more descriptive than, say, "garage", which can mean about three different things. The "neo-" prefix is so 90's tho'. Can't wait for "neo-ironic".