So, here's the deal: every record is rated on its Mix Tape Quotient, or MTQ. This is the number of songs worthy of repeated listenings on that album. For example, a great 3-song 7" would get 3/3 or a hit-and-miss 12-song cd would get 7/12.
An interesting approach, though I'm not sure of how useful it is; some discs worth it for just a handful of brilliant tracks. (One example I could think of could be Slowdive's Pygmalion; as a totality it works splendidly, though there are only 3 or 4 at most tracks I'd choose on their own from it*). And one brilliant track could beat 7 passably good tracks.
And there's the question of what threshold you set for something being on a mix tape; does it have to really stand out, or just be good? Is it bad form to put more than N tracks by one artist on a mix tape (or CD)? (A number of years ago, I was in the habit of putting way too much Paradise Motel on my mix tapes; one or two I made contained about half of Some Deaths Take Forever, interleaved with other stuff. I try to avoid this sort of thing these days, though the last one I made did have several Field Mice-related tracks on it.)
* in case you're wondering, Rutti, Crazy For You, Blue Skied An' Clear and possibly J's Heaven; though the others do a good job of filling out the whole.
Posted by: GJW | http://the-fix.org | Wed Sep 18 04:10:42 2002
Very true, Andrew, I think this system ignores the value that albums DO have as a whole. The only song off Sonic Youth's Daydream Nation I've ever put on a mix tape is Teenage Riot. Does that mean the album gets a 1/13? Hardly; it's the kind of album you have to listen to as a whole - it wasn't designed to be chopped up onto mix tapes as, say, a Ben Folds album might be.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Wed Sep 18 05:30:29 2002
Or indeed Dead Can Dance's _Within the Realm of a Dying Sun_.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Andrew | http://realkosh.weblogs.com/ | Wed Sep 18 01:23:14 2002
And what of albums that are good as a whole but individual songs arn't as interesting... possibly a "DJ set" quotient? How many tracks on there would you mix into a set? And songs that are 45 minutes long (or even just 10), that would be terrible or annoying on a mix tape but are in fact brilliant?
I think a high mix tape quotient would be a good indication of the type of music it is (ie. pop).