(And I was wondering why there wasn't one right-wing populist jingoblog among the nominations, despite the dominance of such blogs in the public eye (and if you're reading this, you're by definition not the public eye; sorry).)
And then there are the Anti-Bloggies, which are the Razzies to the Bloggies' Oscars (or the Ig Nobels to the Bloggies' Nobels, or something like that), but still tend to focus on Well-Known Blogging Personalities and the memes that pass between them.
(Tangent: one of the downsides of a reputation economy is that it tends to be riddled with cliques, with insiders getting bonus Whuffie just for whom they know, and things soon starting to resemble the sociology of a high school canteen or a goth club, where your status depends more on petty politics than on your individual qualities. Discuss.)
Probably one of the more succinct and sensible comments about this whole affair I've read. Left, right, middle. Who cares?
In the words of someone I know, "this is just askin for some bitchslapping".
Mind you, I came up with about 6 categories for last years Anti-Bloggies. Everyone's in a clique of some sort.
I read a pretty hilarious analysis of the internet-as-catholic-highschool phenomenon at angry white girl (www.angrywhitegirl.com/weblog/weblog.php). The chat room cliques, the popularity contests, etc.
Loved the scandal of the bloggies.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
http://grudnuk.com
Sun Jan 26 14:19:57 2003
This is news?