Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 02:02:27 2003
Or maybe it will prompt a return to the old days of painting graffiti with paintbrushes? (One still sees some really old slogans painted on walls in this fashion around here. I suppose you could pass off a revival of this method as post-ironic retro or something too.)
Posted by: kvaternion | http://psychosium.dk | Thu Feb 20 07:58:34 2003
Even though there are obvious appeals to actually painting your graffiti, I think that speed is still a rather important factor for most. Stickerbombing anyone?
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 08:29:59 2003
Or even stencilling. (see also: http://www.banksy.co.uk/ )
If you're going for the old-skool hip-hop look, aerosol is the go. Though crisp Adobe Illustrator-generated stencils are becoming more common. Then again, a lot of that has been appropriated by "guerilla" ad agencies and T-shirt fashion labels. These days, it's hard to tell what's culture-jamming agitprop, what's a logo campaign for a new energy drink or car, and what's connected with some dance-music night.
Posted by: okiba | http://okiba75.net | Thu Feb 20 10:46:39 2003
This technology may prove a deterrent for a short time, but I suspect it will have the same effect that any "zero-tolerance" policy has had on graffiti.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 11:37:54 2003
I.e., raise the stakes and make it into a more prestigious extreme sport?
Did you hear about the armed graffiti gangs in Spain who hold up trains, spraypaint them, and then send in photos to underground webzines, all for the prestige?
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com | Thu Feb 20 11:37:55 2003
The printing of millions of stickers with the word "TOY" written on them, sticking those anywhere bad graffiti is found. That might work. Yeaaaah...
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 12:00:32 2003
Or it might get the crap beaten out of you.
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com | Thu Feb 20 12:03:26 2003
Most graffitists are weedy little fuckers, though.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 12:34:37 2003
Yes, but they move in groups, and listen to a lot of gangsta rap about "bustin' caps" of people who don't give you "respect".
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com | Thu Feb 20 13:26:46 2003
They'll respect me with my cricket bat.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu Feb 20 23:34:42 2003
You've got a thing about cricket bats lately.
Posted by: mark | http://cyberfuddle.com/infinitebabble/ | Fri Feb 21 01:33:53 2003
Graham, what effect would "TOY" stickers have?
Posted by: Claire | http://www.eskimo.com/~c/ | Sat Feb 22 17:10:11 2003
As we all know (<http://ready.gov/biological_visual2.html>), terrorists will use spray cans to distribute biological agents. Maybe they got some Federal funding for this project....
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com | Sun Feb 23 05:02:39 2003
Simple. Graffitists don't like being labelled "toys".
Posted by: Schmicko Micko | http:// | Wed Feb 26 11:21:37 2003
Big black drippy ugly lines from re-filled liquid boot polish bottles.
Mini sponge paint rollers plus stencils = silent and stylish + cheaper and option of mixing your own paints. Glass etch anyone?
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: kvaternion | http://kvaternion.psychosium.dk | Wed Feb 19 23:55:17 2003
It may discourage casual painters, but the pros will find a way to circumvent it, which might even be a good thing, because they have a sense of honour and aestethics and will most likely only target ugly, public structures. Still a 100 feet range? Sounds like it will be guarding very expensive neighbourhoods at best.