Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Thu Apr 17 13:58:17 2003
It's unfortunate that development of XF86 has progressed to such a snail's pace when it's vital to the acceptance of Linux on the desktop. The fact that features like this, and the extensions for anti-aliased font rendering etc. have to be hacked together by 3rd parties instead of built straight into X years ago when they were due highlights this.
Fortunately, things are being stirred up in the XF86 world and we might get back to real progress soon: http://www.xwin.org/
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Thu Apr 17 13:32:51 2003
It's unfortunate that development of XF86 has progressed to such a snail's pace when it's vital to the acceptance of Linux on the desktop. The fact that features like this, and the extensions for anti-aliased font rendering etc. have to be hacked together by 3rd parties instead of built straight into X years ago when they were due highlights this.
Fortunately, things are being stirred up in the XF86 world and we might get back to real progress soon: http://www.xwin.org/