Richard Dawkins, Atheist headkicker extraordinaire, wants to remedy this by taking a leaf from the gay pride movement's book, appropriating a more cheerful and positive word for the atheist/agnostic/skeptic community. Just as homosexuals became gays, atheists can now call themselves Brights. Which strikes me as a bit silly, though maybe it'll catch on. (Though wasn't the word "gay" used as a term of abuse for people deviating from sexual norms before the gay-pride movement reappropriated it? Perhaps a catchy meme would require setting up a puppet anti-atheist vilification movement to plant an easily invertible term of abuse in the ideosphere.) (via FmH)
According to a gay friend of mine who might not be reliable, "gay" (in the context of homosexuality) was first used as sort of a secret handshake. So, if you asked someone "how are you" and they said "Oh, I'm gay" they probably were, but it wouldn't arouse suspicion among people who might not take too kindly to that.
I have no idea if that is true or not, but it sounds kind of plausible.
"Gay" has a promiscuous history, e.g. a "gay house" was a term for a whore house and a "gay" was a male prostitute.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
http://
Mon Jun 23 15:22:28 2003
"Brights"?!? Nah, won't catch on, particularly as you're replacing one social crime (atheism) with another (self-labelled intellectualism). In any case if you were really smart, you'd be a meta-agnostic (not sure if you're not sure or not).