Several questions arise from this: firstly, if the FBI can do this, what's to prevent others with fewer legal safeguards from doing this? (I.e., the CIA/MI6/Mossad/ASIO, Colombian drug cartels, even some of those unemployed Eastern European technological geniuses.) The current system does involve the FBI going through the service provider with a court order, but what's to prevent an agency with more resources (or fewer constraints) from spoofing the service provider's systems, or cracking into them and subverting them from within? And secondly, how many other everyday devices in your home have hidden microphones which can be remotely activated by law enforcement agencies, and which you don't know about because they've never been ruled against?
Posted by: bryan | http:// | Sat Nov 22 20:56:41 2003
hmm, what's to prevent me doing it!
reach for the stars, that's what I always say.
hmm2, I wonder if fed cars have online navigational systems.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: mitch | http://www.buffyworld.com/angel/season4/transcripts/85_tran.php | Fri Nov 21 10:14:04 2003
"Wow. People used to think that *I* was paranoid... I mean, don't get me wrong. I still got the implants in my head. C.I.A. is still listening in. It just doesn't bother me anymore. Instead, II beam Jasmine's love up to their satellite, you know? Share the love with those M.K.-Ultra bastards."