Posted by: PEL | http:// | Thu Jan 15 18:20:05 2004
The author dismisses the use of nuclear energy too quickly - if necessary, we would no doubt crank up the production of refineries very quickly. The problem of course would be with terrorists. Osama and his ilk would probably revel in the scenario depicted in the article
Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Fri Jan 16 05:07:36 2004
"The problem of course would be with terrorists."
Damn terrorists steal all the glory. What about materials transport / waste disposal / uncontrolled meltdown issues? They concern me more than any terrorist threat, because they _are_ are problem, have been a problem for years, and will continue to be. Assuming the War On Terizm is going to be won, Osama won't be a problem in 20 years...will he?
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Fri Jan 16 12:35:35 2004
In 20 years' time (assuming humanity doesn't go extinct, of course), there are going to be a lot of pissed-off Arabs with nothing to lose. So, whatever happens with Osama, terrorism may very well still be a problem.
Posted by: Graham | http://grudnuk.com/ | Sat Jan 17 01:15:10 2004
On the other hand, there's the other argument that oil has been a curse for the Arabs, since it's dramatically increased the gap between the haves and have-nots.
Posted by: willc2 | http:// | Sun Jan 25 09:09:12 2004
no oil = no international travel
i guess they'll fly hang gliders into buildings then.
cool.
splat!
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: mitch | http:// | Thu Jan 15 12:02:49 2004
Some commentary: http://www.livejournal.com/users/regohemia/102218.html