Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Mon Apr 5 01:36:09 2004
Nice!
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Mon Apr 5 02:17:15 2004
JM: Sorry about that. Next time I'll try and get some naked chicks in the picture or something.
Posted by: mark | http://donotuselifts.net/ | Mon Apr 5 07:02:32 2004
While I <em>am</em> interested in the above photos, I heartily endorse the idea of you taking -- and publishing -- photos of naked chicks, Andrew.
Er, tastefully and artistically done, of course. Er, if you'd like.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Mon Apr 5 14:03:24 2004
Of course.
Though, for that I'd need some volunteers. Judging by the "Females Wanted for Nude Modelling Work" flyers seen around the place (probably the work of one of those punk/goth/raver porn websites), the going rate for that sort of thing is around $100/hour. I might just stick to stencil art, urban decay and plays of light for the time being.
Posted by: Antti | http:// | Mon Apr 5 20:04:30 2004
I have no idea what this site is about. I think I gave google the good ole' dev:null and "I'm feeling lucky"..but hey, Life is an adventure right ?? Anyway, nude chicks == good, play with light == equally good..Play of light on nude chicks, now THAT'S art. Well, must be off, take care all! :D
Posted by: science | http://soul.scan.swin.edu.au/~hinnesbrown/diary.php | Tue Apr 6 04:38:16 2004
i know that pole
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: JM | http:// | Sun Apr 4 23:59:39 2004
I fail to see anything remotely interesting in these.