(Re Godwin's Law: Is it still mentioning Nazis in vain when it's about someone calling for mass sterilisation of "subhuman vermin", as opposed to advocating their text editor preferences or whatever?)
Posted by: toby | http:// | Fri Apr 16 00:31:22 2004
I picked all but two of them correctly. It was the use of language that gave it away though.
Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Fri Apr 16 23:03:47 2004
I like the clear linguistic differences pointed out by one weblogged: Nazis tend to speak about genocide as a justice issue...a national duty. Footballers speak about it like it's a spectator sport.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Ben | http://rocknerd.org/~Ben/journal/ | Fri Apr 16 00:19:24 2004
I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Or, another way of looking at it: LGF had already self-Godwinned before the quiz was made; all the quiz does is lift the lid.