Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org | Thu May 13 06:22:52 2004
It wouldn't surprise me if some particularly antisocial worm writers have taken up the challenge of writing the most lifelike (i.e., indistinguishable from a human) child-porn downloading worm. The winner would simulate human browsing patterns and even half-heartedly delete most of the files (whilst leaving the data for forensic detection), and toss out clues in a way that resembles carelessness. The worm/virus would also behave in a way that the writer could identify it from news reports of arrests. That way, when some poor fucker goes to the wall for your worm, the author of the worm and all the fellow nihilists they've bragged to knows that they've won.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Thu May 13 04:02:58 2004
If malware can do this as a byproduct of browser redirections, how long before someone develops a virus that deliberately downloads child porn to deep, sinister directories on your hard drive? _That_ would be nasty.