It wouldn't surprise me if some particularly antisocial worm writers have taken up the challenge of writing the most lifelike (i.e., indistinguishable from a human) child-porn downloading worm. The winner would simulate human browsing patterns and even half-heartedly delete most of the files (whilst leaving the data for forensic detection), and toss out clues in a way that resembles carelessness. The worm/virus would also behave in a way that the writer could identify it from news reports of arrests. That way, when some poor fucker goes to the wall for your worm, the author of the worm and all the fellow nihilists they've bragged to knows that they've won.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
http://the-fix.org
Thu May 13 04:02:58 2004
If malware can do this as a byproduct of browser redirections, how long before someone develops a virus that deliberately downloads child porn to deep, sinister directories on your hard drive? _That_ would be nasty.