And they are quite different; Chris Lowe's disc is mostly italo-disco with some gospel and soul, whereas Neil Tennant's tends towards a cool, cerebral mix of contemporary classical and glitchtronica (and, indeed, the sort of thing you might expect to hear on Utility Fog in Sydney or one of the more avant-garde programmes on 3RRR). The one artist they have in common: Dusty Springfield (of course).
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Peter | http://www.frogworth.com/blog/ | Sat May 7 15:10:12 2005
Hey! Much though I do agree that Tennant's set is closer to my taste than Lowe's abominable selection, nevertheless I don't believe there's even *one* track on the Tennant mix that I have played, or quite possibly would ;) I'm a PSB fan, but that ends pretty abruptly around the Very/Relentless album. Either at it or after it, depending on my mood.