Jackson's lawyers have threatened to sue the winemaker. It is not clear on what grounds: will they claim that Jackson owns the trademark "Jesus Juice", or instead claim false advertising given that it is a wine rather than a sugary alcopop?![]()
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
http://
Fri Nov 11 17:03:32 2005
Actually, under U.S. law, it's pretty clear what their cause of action will be . . . there's a law protecting the "right of publicity" of celebrities or other public figures, that forbids the use of their images without their consent.