It remains to be seen whether this suggestion will become government policy.
Posted by: El Bizarro | http://bizarro.typepad.com | Sat Dec 10 17:05:32 2005
Yet again more drivel from the "won't someone think of the children" jackboot brigade. Of course, they only mean filtering pornographic content and if this happens to mean that other seditious content, such as, oh, I don't know, like evolutionary theory, for example, gets filtered out, then it's a small price to pay for our children's safety.
If these turds are so concerned about the safety of the children, they could start by banning the Catholic church from having access to them and stop bombing the crap out of them in other countries.
But what would I know, I'm just a loonie lefty with carpel tunnel syndrome.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: refnofollow | http:// | Fri Dec 9 16:22:26 2005
Guess what : France's currently thinking about making unauthorized protected contents access filtering mandatory for ...em... any device, including IP routers. (we'll see abt this in a few weeks from now). Most other E.U. will soon have similar but maybe lighter law.
More : http://www.eucd.org/