Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org/ | Sat Feb 4 21:33:13 2006
But was the cat in question unusually soft-hearted, or just uncommonly forward-thinking?
Posted by: steff | http:// | Mon Feb 6 10:02:47 2006
I believe the theory forwarded was that the lioness had lost her cub (cub?) and "out of grief" (!) adopted another species' young as replacement. The lioness was starving herself watching and guarding the wildebeast, while the wildebeast was starving being cut off from its mother. Apparently this has happened several times and was not a one-off freak accident.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org/ | Mon Feb 6 10:34:02 2006
So the cat didn't reason that the bird would be a good tool for catching other birds?
I wonder whether there have been any instances of predators reasoning that, in some cases, it may be better to adopt a prey animal and use it as a lure than to eat it.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: steff | http:// | Sat Feb 4 03:08:07 2006
Saw a documentary once where a lioness adopted a young wildebeast. Two different instincts fighting it out. So much for eat or be eaten...?