There is not yet a maps.google.com.au, and searches for Australian locations yield little ("melbourne australia" will get you on the right page, though anything below that, like, say, "northcote australia", a street name or a post code, draws a blank), though if you go to the US, UK or Japanese site and drag, you can get to the wide brown land with green bits around the edges.
Posted by: gjw | http://the-fix.org | Fri May 19 12:14:16 2006
It is quite complete (Check out the detail of the Birdsville track around the SA / QLD border - you can't get much more remote than that), but it's really no different from what has been offered on Multimap or Whereis for years now. Well, the property boundaries are nice. And the Google interface is nice. But I don't for the life of me understand why it took them so long to get their hands on the dataset.
Posted by: acb | http://dev.null.org/ | Fri May 19 15:18:47 2006
Multimap and its ilk suck dead bunnies through a straw. The window's too small, clicking on arrows to move around is bordering on play-by-mail map navigation, and the area around the window tends to be spammy with ads and promotional links.
Want to say something? Do so here.
Note to spammers: This comment system applies the rel=nofollow attribute to the poster's URL and all links. Posting links to this page will not improve their search engine rankings.
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Posted by: Andrew | | Fri May 19 08:04:22 2006
It includes obscure QLD mining towns (I looked up my old place) so I'd say it's pretty complete.