Given that the Olympics are a merchandising exercise which invariably involves notionally liberal states bending over to placate corporate sponsors by suspending civil liberties, perhaps it would be better if future Olympics were held only in totalitarian states, where the legal frameworks are already in place. Pyongyang 2016 perhaps? I hear the North Koreans put on a killer show...
Please keep comments on topic and to the point. Inappropriate comments may be deleted.
Note that markup is stripped from comments; URLs will be automatically converted into links.
Wed Mar 17 00:54:56 2010
I have been certain that the Olympics should be permanently confined to one location but never picked a location. Pyongyang it is. That would be beautiful. They are excellent at spectacles in stadiums and their roads are reportedly empty so transportation wouldn't be a problem. As noted, social control has been taken care of. Having the IOC force an Olympics on an anti-tourist country would require them to wine and dine North Korea instead of the IOC being wined and dined by lunatics desperate to land the event. I don't know how North Korea could refuse the offer and, if they accept, it would destroy the government. Perhaps, instead of waging wars to create peace, we could wage Olympics.