psychoceramics: Re: PRAYER,Thur22Feb96 sermon on Emailbombers

[David Fleck <fleck @ horton.Colorado.EDU>]

In article <4gjd37$u--@d--.dartmouth.edu> A. Plutonium wrote:
>Since the ONE ATOM PLUTONIUM EVERYTHING UNIVERSE unifies all
>subjects,especially all the sciences I will crosspost to the above
>newsgroups. Also, many sites do not receive the newsgroup
>Altar-of-Science -Physics-is-Plutonium abbreviated
>alt.sci.physics.plutonium.  Thus, I have taken it upon myself to
>sermonize to the worlds enlightened and unenlightened via crossposting.
>
>In the past three days especially, but it has occurred during my start
>on the Usenet in 12Aug1993. Some people like to throw darts or needles
>at other people. They like to do this because their own lives are
>barren of substance and meaning.
>
>They do this behavior in many ways not just emailbombing, but petty
>theft or littering or leaving coffee cups for the poor other person to
>pick up after. Many, many ways do these less-than-level people get
>their kicks.
>
>Emailbombing is one way. For they figure there is no reprisal. And
>since they have nothing better to do, they gloat in it.
>
>In the last 3 days the emailbombing has become untolerable for me to
>smoothly do my science work. I decided to engage full blast with it
>today so that a permanent future record is kept of this grave problem
>of the Internet and Email. I consider the two as complementary
>functions. What I mean is that the email can help or destroy Internet
>and vice versa. Thus, rules for Internet and Email must be made
>integral. For instance, a death threat on Internet is to be treated the
>same as a death threat on email. And the legislators who make laws for
>the Internet ought to consider Email as integral to the Internet.
>
>Today I wanted to spend most of my daylight time tackling this
>emailbombing to show people what fierce hatred exists for me. I am not
>treated fairly on the Internet. There is no rules against posting 5-10
>articles at most per day to any public newsgroup. It is not the volume
>for which I post, nor the crossposting, but the contents of my message.
>I am the discoverer of the Atom Universe which replaces god with an
>atom. Thus, hatred for me is of the maximum. And anyway in which these
>hate-filled persons sees as throwing needles or darts at me, they
>indulge with pleasure.
>
>Today I filled sci.bio.ethology with approx 100 posts and it is now
>holding 140 posts. Sci.physics has near 900 posts, so 140 is not
>cumbersome by any means. The dickheads in sci.bio.ethology if they
>wanted to keep people out of their group should have made it Moderated.
>Instead they attack me with perpetual emailbombing.
>
>  I will not have an email box until these silly kids get their act
>together or their sysadm throttles their activity.
>
>  I will not be bullied out of a public newsgroup
>
>  Not that being said. I will continue as normal, without an email box,
>if need be
>
>  Sci.bio.ethology, or psychology or whatever, if not moderated is
>public. Email boxes are private. Noone will bully me by flooding my
>emailbox and it is only a matter of time before you culprits are
>punished for your flagrant miscreance.
>
>  It was worth a day of my time to show these bozos that they are
>veritable bozos. I will not repeat that performance of filling a
>newsgroup with 100 posts. I will simple turn down my email box and the
>violators can eat all of their bombings.
>
>  I hope Email legislation does not take the backseat to Usenet or Web
>legislation. Not many people have experienced what it is like to have a
>bozo pressing the send key every second.