[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psychoceramics: The Dilbert Psychoceramics
- To: Ken Alexander <k--@e--.umich.edu>
- Subject: Re: psychoceramics: The Dilbert Psychoceramics
- From: Robert Bain <arbane @ idt.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 19:31:47 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: p--@z--.net
- In-Reply-To: <199706251950.PAA--@q--.eecs.umich.edu>
- Sender: owner-psychoceramics
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Ken Alexander wrote:
> I was shocked by the last chapter of Scott Adams' _The Dilbert Future_.
> Most of the book is excellent humor similar to material in the earlier
> _Dilbert Principle_, but the last chapter seems off-topic and goes way
> over the edge.
Also, I'm _reasonably_ certain that his comments about the double-slit
experiment are wrong. (IIRC, he states that the results of the experiment
depend on _what theory_ the experimenter is testing.)
Anyone here who knows the physics _and_ read the book that's willing tom
comment?
(The rest of the book was very funny, mind you.)
Arbane ther Terrible (Skeptic)