psychoceramics: Wayne Manzo

[St Aardvark the Carpeted <a--@i--.bc.ca>]

Actually, weird thing is that just yesterday I discovered Mr Manzo's web
page (http://members.tripod.com/~amline/cv96471.html) and decided to
forward the lawsuit against Madonna (among others).  Hope this isn't old
news.  Highlights:  discoloured stools and feminized leg.  Edited for
typographical legibility. Your mileage may vary.  And remember:  watch the
skies! 

I am now blessing your restraining order...

St Aardvark the Carpeted                    a--@i--.bc.ca
You always use violence.  I should've ordered glutinous rice chicken.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

 Federal Civil Rights Action Filed in Newark, NJ While Engineering Student
                        was Homeless CV-96-471(PHP)
   
   Wayne E. Manzo
   Newark, NJ
   
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                      
                          THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
                                      
Wayne E. Manzo               )
             Plaintiff,      )
                             )
      vs.                    )            CIVIL COMPLAINT
                             )
John Acurio,                 )            (BIVENS ACTION)
Gilbert Weden,               )
Teresa Kline,                )               JURY TRIAL
Peter Meitner,               )
Mark Valco,                  )
                             )
John M. Deutch,              )            DOCKET # _______
                             )
John M. McConnel,            )            CASE # CV-96-471(NHP)
                             )            Filed: Jan. 1996
Louise Ciccone,              )
                             )
Michael Romance,             )
Denise Romance,              )
Kathryn Jederlinich,         )
Brian Manzo,                 )
           Defendants        )
_____________________________)

   This complaint is against the above defendants for their involvement in
the ongoing civil/human rights violations and other federal violations

CAUSE OF ACTION:

   Defendant's family, Brian Manzo, Denise Romance, Michael Romance,
Kathryn Jederlinich, conspired to have federal government agencies harass
the plaintiff since approxiametly 1979, Plaintiff has been under illegal
surveillance by the named governmental agencie s on the impetus of the
plaintiff's family because of his alleged homosexual behavior.

   Plaintiff's personal life has been controlled by defendants B. Manzo,
Romance, and Jederlinich, with the help of federal government agencies;
violating the plaintiff's right t o be left alone. 

   Defts B. Manzo, D. Romance, M. Romance, K. Jederlinich, And L. Ciccone,
conspired with the CIA and U.S. Army Propulsion Directorate in December of
1987 resulting in the p laintiff being set-up in a scandal with the U.S.
Army Propulsion Directorate, at the NAS A-Lewis Research Center,
Cleveland, Ohio; where-upon the federal government removed all of the
plaintiff's civil rights, initiated social and economic black-balling, and
began illegal non-consensual medical experimentation in an attempt to make
him heterosexual.

   Plaintiff was drugged while working as an engineering intern for the U.S. Army Propulsion
Directorate (drugged in March of 1988, after three months of civilian
employment with the Army) resulting in a 60% reduction in mental activity
and extreme emotional distress.

 U.S. Army employees: Acurio, Weden, Meitner, Kline, Valco, conspired to
give the plaintiff a brain wash/mind control drug in March of
1988...plaintiff was then harassed, manipulated, threatened by the Army
defts., and then fired from the engineering position in September of
1988 (he was hired in Decemeber of 1989).

   Plaintiff has been continously assaulted, psychologically, and physically, a
nd publicly defamed by the defts and their agents since his termination
from the U.S. Army Propulsion Directorate in 1988.

Said threats, physical assaults, and public defamation, have deterred and/or de
layed the plaintiff from obtaining administrative or legal redress.

   The defts and their agents have continued to utilize illegal/high
technology methods to incapacitate the plaintiff. In april of 1989 he was
poisoned while emploued at Tappan Automation (Hackensack, NJ) which lasted
for apporoximately one year. 

   The defts and their agents have contaminated the plaintiff's clothhing and a
utomobile from April 1989 through November of 1992 while he was residing
in Bergen County, NJ resulting in the burning of the skin on his back and
forearms, testicular pain, intense emotional distress, and mental dullness.

   On or about July 28, 1991, defts and their agents conspired to prevent
the plaintiff from petitioning an administrative governmental agency(EEOC) 
concerning aggressive retaliatory a ction taken by the U.S. Army
Propulsion Directorate. Plaintiff's automobile and home were severly
contaminated and he was set-up by the CIA and Brian Manzo one day before
he was to mail a grievance to the EEOC at NASA-Lewis, Cleveland. The
plaintiff was illegally incarcerated and tortured for two weeks, denied
counsel and procedural due process. While incarcerated plaintiff was given
clothing which severly burned his left leg and was told that deft Weden
was responsible. Plaintiff postponed filing the EEOC grievance for one year
fearing further retaliation by the defts and their agents.

   Defendants and their agents conspired to obstruct justice and deny the
plaintiff access to the courts in October of 1992. Plaintiff filed a civil
rights complaint, cv-92-3553 Newark, N J, against the Army defts; the
complaint was served in October of 1992.  Plaintiff was subsequently
tortured, threatened, and chased across the country and set-up/entrapped
in Clark County, Nevada where he was illegally arrested and detained for
one year. Deft. Weden appeared at th e Henderson jail shortly after the
plaintiff was arrested and stated that the plaintiff had lied to the Army
and that they were going to murder him in jail. Plaintiff was denied
counsel and procedural due process during the one year political
imprisonment(November 10, 1992 - November 5, 1993). Plaintiff could not
prosecute his NJ civil rights complaint as a result of retaliatory action
by the defendants and their agents. 

   Defendants and their agents conspired to obstruct justice by preventing
the plaintiff from defendening against criminal charges while incarcerated
for one year in the state of Nevada.Plaintiff was denied legal counsel and
access to the courts concerning his arre st...as a result, the plaintiff
was incarcerated for one year, illegally, in Nevada, without bail an
without procedural due process..the state of Nevada's criminal case
against the plaintiff was subsequently dism issed with prejudice.
Plaintiff alleges that the incarceration was retaliatory and politically
based for his civil rights complaint filed in Newark, NJ against the Army
Propulsion Directorate Defts. 

   Defendants and their agents have been utilizing high technology mehtods
to defame the plaintiff by placing him in a false public light; which
includes, but is not limited to, the utilization of people in the
entertainment industry (deft. L. Ciccone) to target the plaintiff and to
generate public hatred against him. The defts. public defamation campaign
has been ongoing since the plaintiff's termination from the U.S.  Army
Propulsion Directorate. Defts and their agents have
broadcasted/distributed fraudulent information to the public concerning
the plaintiff's integrity and sexual orientation. 

   On or about April 2, 1989, the deft and their agents tortured and
threatened the plaintiff by burning his skin and testicles, utilizing mind
control(and other high tech. methods), having agents tell him that a
contract was taken out on his life, enlisting the help of the plaintiff's
own father, Joseph E. Manzo(allegedly died in 1992) to manipulate the
plaintiff into phoning the U.S. Army Propulsion Directorate defts and
begging for mercy. The Army subsequently communicated/ broadcasted the
phone conversation to the public...using it as a justification to destroy
the plaintiff's life. The U.S.Army Propulsion Directorate continues to use
an altered version of the phone conversation to defame the plaintiff. 

   The defendants and their agents have administered cruel and unusual
puonishm ent to the plaintiff since his wrongful termination from the U.S. 
Propulsion Directorate in 1988. These acts against the plaintiff's person
are in violation of the eighth amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These
aggressive/savage acts against the plaintiff include, but are not limited 
to, the following:

   a) drugging him while employed for the U.S. Army resulting in mental
disorentation and incapacitation.

   b) contamination of the plaintiff's food resulting in gastrointestinal
pain, stool discoloration, testicular pain, and mental distress...these
attacks have been ongoing since the plaintiff's termination from the U.S.
Army in 1988.

   c) contamination of the plaintiff's food resulting in the burning of
his lips, tongue, and gums, blood excretion, and the loosening of teeth.
These assaults were initiated shortly after the plaintiff was fired from
the Army.

   d) contamination of the plaintiff's food, while he was a politial
prisoner in Nevada, resulting in the burning of his rectum, buttox, eyes,
stomach. This assault occured on, or about, July 18, 1993, after he filed
a federal complaint concerning his illegal imprisonmnent in Nevada. 

   e) contamination of the plaintiff's food resulting in his chemical
castratra tion. On, or about April 2, 1993, while he was a politcial
prisoner in Nevada, agents of the defts conspired to give the plaintiff
food contaminated with radioactive isotopes which caused intensse
testicular pain and permanent feminization of his body. Plaintiff was told
by agents of the defts that he was being punished by the Army and they
were going to take his manhood away____he was also told that they were
going to cure him of his homosexuality. 

   g) contamination of the plaintiff's clothes and bedding resulting in
the bur ning of his legs testicular pain, and mental attenuation. On
November 23, 1994, plaintiff's clothes and bedding were contaminated while
he was staying at a homeless shelter (called the Way Station) in
Burlington, VT.

   h) utilizing high tech. to selectively burn portions of the plaintiff's
body. On January 8th through the 12th the defts, and their agents,
utilized high technology methods to burn the inside thighs of the
plaintiff resulting in elevated skin temperatures, redness, opoen sores,
cellular damage, and bleeding. The plaintiff's legs are scared and
feminized as a result of the attack.  Plaintiff's face and mouth were
burned on June 22, 1994, while residing in Las Vegas, NV. 

   i) the defendants and their agents have distributed, electronically altered,
 video tapes which depict the plaintiff in sexual acts. Public
distribution of these tapes have created defamation and intense emotional
distress. Public distribution of said video tapes is a maliciious attempt
to discredit and humilate the plaintiff. Major distribution commenced
after the plaintiff was fired from the U.S. Army in 1988. Defts have also
utilized the internet to distribute defamatory/fraudulent information
about the palintiff. 

    j)in 1989 defts and their agents conspired to broadcast false
information about the plainiff. Fabricated broadcast indicated that the
plaintiff had a mental break-down while employed for the Army and that he
had sxually exposed himself to fellow Army engineeriing intern Kline. 
Public disclosure of this fraudulent information resulted in defamation
and intense emotional distress and is another example of outrageous
conduct by the federal defts and their agents. 

    k) defendants and their agents have disclosed false information to the
public stating that he tried to cheat the U.S. Army/CIA, that he is a bad
person, and that he is homosexual. These malicious
broadcast/distribution/communication of this fraudulent information has
directed pulbic hatred and wrath at the plaintiff land has resulted in
intense emotional distress. 

    l)defendants and their agents have utilized high technology to invade
the plaintiff's privacy and to expose his privatae life to the public.
Public exposure of the plainitff's altered (he was being assaulted,
drugged, and threatened) private life has resulted in intense emotional
distress and defamation. 

    m) defendants and their agents have controlled the plainitff's
employement and kept him in poverty since being terminated from the U.S.
Army in 1988. 

    The above acts by the defendants and their agents are in violation of
the eighth amendmant to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits cruel and
unusual punishment.

    Defendants and their agents conspired, under color of state law, to
violate the federal rights of the plaintiff during his political
incarceration in Nevada from November 10, 1992 through November 5, 1993.

    Defendants and their agents conspired to deny the plaintiff counsel,
to obs truct justice, to deny procedural due process, to deny bail, to
inflict cruel and unusual punishment during the plaintiff's political
incarceration in Nevada. 

    Plaintiff was set-up in a sting operation on November10, 1992, in
Clark Cou nty, Nevada.  Plaintiff was falsely arrested in the City of
Henderson and initially detained at the Henderson County Jail where Army
defdt Weden appeared and threatened the plaintiff. Plaintiff was severely
tortured psychologically and physically while incarcerated at the
Henderson jail. 

    Agents of the defendants conspired to deny th plaitntiff access to the
cour t; preventing him from defending against alleged criminal conduct
against the state of Nevada. Plaintiff was purposely denied the assistance
of legal counsel and was purposely denied the right to defend himself. 

    Agents of the defendents conducted radiation experiments on the
plaintiff during the peridod of his incarceration in Nevada without his
consent.  Agents of th defts gave the plaintiff food and clothing that
were radioactive resulting in the burning of his skin, stomach, eyes,
testicules, rectum, buttox, along with mental disorentation. Plaintiff was
also given LSD.  Plaintiff was told by agents of the defts (guards and
workers) that they were going to take his manhood away and make him
straight. 

    Defendants and their agents conspired to incarcerate the plaintiff for
one year in Nevada without affording him procedural due process (his case
was purposely prevented from rach ing the preliminary trial stage), there
was no conviction, and the state dismissed the criminal charge with
prejucide in Febuary of 1993.

    The above actions by the defendants and their agents concerning the
illegal incarceration of the plaintiff in Nevada are in violation of
U.S.C. 42 Section 1981, 1983, 19 85, 1986, 1992. 

    Defendants and their agents have been using the plaintiff as a human
guinea pig in an inhumane behavioral modification experiment utilizing
radiation and other lethal/high technology methods to alter his private
sexual behavior. 

    Since March of 1989, defendants and their agents have been utilizing
radiation and other high technology methods in an attempt to
control/change the plaintiff's emotions and sexual behavior. Defts and
their agents have utilized public defamation and targetng in conjucti on
with the abouve methods, in an attempt to control the plaintiff's private
behavior. This cruel and unusual assault on the plainiff's private life
has resulted in irreparable psychological and physical damage along with
ostracization (social sterilizition) from the communities that he has
resided in.

    The above acts by the defts and their agents are in violation of the
plaintiff's right to privacy and his right to bodily privacy___as
stipulated or inferred by the U.S. Constit ution amendments 4,9, 14. 

    Defts and thier agents have utilized high tech. methods to place the
plaint iff in a state of indentured servitude or peonage. Since 1979, on
the impetus of plaintiff's family, the plaintiff has been under high tech. 
surveillance by the federal government. 

    Since 1989, the defendants have utilized high technology to control
the pla intiff's behavioral responses and actions(mind control) and to
commercially exploit the gross intrusion on the plainiff's private life
without his approval or affording him monetary compensation. These actions
by the defts and their agents constitute high technology slavery or
peonage and has resulted in irreparable damage to the pla intiff's good
name, extreme emotional distress, and defamation.

    The above acts by the defts and their agents are in violation of U.S.C. 42
Section 1994, and the thirteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    The actions by the defts and their agents are in violation of common
tort law and federal statute constituting:

         ASSAULT AND BATTER:

         INVASION OF PRIVACY:

            a)placing a private person in a false public light.

            b)commercial exploitation of a private person.

            c)gross intrusion on the solitude of a private person.

            d)illegal, un-consensual experimentation.

         DEFAMATION:

            a)broadcasting of fraudulent information to defame and induce
              emotional distress.

            b)distribution of fraudulent video tapes to the public in order
              to defame and induce emotional distress.

            c)distribution of fraudulent tape recordings to defame and induce
              extreme emotional distress.

              Jurisdiction of the federal court is based on :
                                      
     * U.S.C. 42 Section 1981, 1983, 1985, 1986
     * U.S.C. 42 Section 1992, 1994, 2000
     * U.S.C. 28 Section 1343, 1346, 1331
     * U.S. Constitution amendments 1, 4, 9, 13, 14
     * Doctrine of ancillary, incidental, concurrent, jurisdiction.
     * Diversity of jurisdiction.
     * Federal questions.


    The plaintiff is seeking punitive damages of $50,000,000 and
compensatory damages of $50,000,000 in additional to injunctive relief
against further actions by the defendants and their agents against the
plaintiff or his good name, or what this honorable court decides is
appropriate compensation. 

    The plaintiff prays that this honorable court will afford him redress
and peace of mind for the attrocities committed against him. 


      Dated ______, 1996                        Wayne E. Manzo
                                                Newark, NJ