This rant was found on USENET:

>Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
>Subject: rape in australia
>Lines: 193
>
>The Program against Rape,
>
>Australia is a country with a secret recent history, and also a secret
>current reality.  The country may have had a purge or proscription between
>the years 1975 and 1986, where perhaps five to ten percent of the population
>were killed.
>
>Most of the deaths were accomplished by having whole groups of people slowly
>kill off selected individuals.  Perhaps, most of the population  was
>involved in the purge.  The telephone system in Australia is almost
>certainly completely bugged.  Certain cities, like Perth, are set up to such
>an extent that tracking an individual from house to house, via sound,  is a
>possibility.  The purge seemed to be a step towards the removal of rape from
>Australia.  In a case of almost increditable Orwellianism the phone system
>seemed to have been used to assist this purge.  There seem to be centres
>somewhere in the city where large numbers of people listen in to the sounds
>make by selected individuals.
>
>Rape is a generic term, and in sexual matters it means: having sex with a
>women who didn’t like having sex with you.  It doesn’t mean not having
>consensual sex, although that is also included in the term   Rape can even
>mean mistreating someone or abusing them.  It is even possible to classical
>rape someone without raping them in the new sense.  You just have to make
>them be happy at the end of it and apparently you haven’t raped them.
>
>As far as I can gather, in Australia, it is necessary to mirror the person
>you wish to have sex with.  That means, for instance, in the case of one man
>I once knew : he wished to have sex with twins who lived as one identity so
>he used two names in his own life.  This was a process of mirroring the
>twins he wished to sleep with.  On another level, if your desired one takes
>a vacation to Monkey Mia you should go see the monkies in the zoo, or
>perhaps even go to a vacation spot which features dolphins (Monkey Mia is
>famous for dolphins) like Bunbury.  The mirroring establishes the ground for
>consensual sex, if that happens.  There were many men from the 70s onward
>who seem to have died because they did not understand this new standard.
>The new standard, in their case, was usually not explicitly told them, and
>it would have been a acute act of perception for them to understand it.
>Many of the young in Australia seem to have been brought up understanding
>the new standard.  The mirroring is a type of marriage.  Aparently, in
>Australia sex must take place within marriage, and there are many new types
>of marriages that are now considered moral in Australia.  For instance, if
>you are in the wedding party of a person, you are considered to have married
>that person in a minor way.  If your girlfriend is in a wedding party and
>you attend the wedding, that is also a type of marriage.  If a women simply
>wears white around you a lot consider that a type of marriage exists between
>you and her.
>
>>From 1986 onward a new increditable event happened in Australia.  White
>males, Australian by birth but mostly brought up overseas, were successively
>brought over to Australia to be the subject or victim of a game played by
>the entire nation against just one individual.  Each one of these males
>would have been classified as rapists in the new sense, so the country would
>have had no problem abusing them and playing the "rape" game against them.
>In the "rape" game the person is punished for their misdeads quite
>extensively and a complicated game of doing to the person what they have
>done to others is played out.  While this is going on almost everybody in
>the country is imitating or “aping” the person involved.  Comedians will be
>funny if the person is considered to be a good comic.  Politicians will act
>in their roles as leaders of the country in a way that they consider the
>“raped” person would do.  There is a heavy playing out of reversal of roles.
>The person is considered “indigineous”, or Aboriginal, and the white women
>in particular will treat him just as white men treated aboriginals in the
>past.  As such a huge amount of unfairness happens against the person
>involved.  As well, in the entire country men consider themselves to be
>women and women consider themselves to be men.  Much of the “rape” goes on
>behind the persons back or involves psychological abuse.  Verbal abuse
>figures heavily in this.  Almost everyone the person encounters that day
>will be speaking louder than  normal about some thing or orther.  The
>message will have a hidden negative message or insult to the person.  The
>acculumated tonnage of negative subliminal messages imparted to the person
>during the day is intense and extreemly debilitating to the person involved.
>The process is refered to as "speiking" or "heiring".  This process of
>speech is equivalent to a type of telepathy which is often mentioned in
>science fiction books, particularly those of Cordwainer Smith  (Norstilla
>book, a book about a planet called Old North Australia).  The new manner of
>speaking (hiding a hidden message within ordinary speech -- or
>steganography) has a type of vocabulary which I will try to assemble as best
>as possible in another article.
>
>As far as the use of subliminal channels through ordinary speech,
>Australians are extreemly familiar with this, and the women, when making
>decisions about the fate of men will always use this form of indirect
>speech.  In fact, direct speech about a sensitive topic, such as the rape
>game, is extreemly frowned upon in Australia.  The people who control the
>listening devices in Australia seem to punish any direct speech about the
>hidden level of control in Australia, while they allow indirect reference to
>it.
>
>Tests feature prominently in Australian life.  The community puts them on as
>acts involving moral decisions to test and grade individuals.  They do seem
>to determine what the person will be allowed to do in Australian life.  I
>usually seem to fail my tests and am abused verbally (in the new heiring
>sense)  quite a lot.  I recommend passing the tests, to anyone who finds
>themselves in a similar situation.  One point to make: for anyone who is
>considered a rapist, the tests seemed to be structured in a way that are
>disadvantageous to the person.  They are administered badly, are graded
>badly.  They often seem to be only put on to take something away from the
>person which the person has legitimately earned.  There is one test where
>you have to walk through a door to stop what you think is a rape going on.
>I recommend you pass this test.  Obviously, in a land having a permanent
>secret progrom against rapists it is desirable to prove you would stop a
>rape from happening if it took place within hearing distance of you.
>
>When people talk about "zero tolerance" they mean "hero tolerance".  It
>means the men have to prove they are brave before they are allowed to have
>women.
>
>Oftentimes, people will crucify your position on abortion, whether it be
>prolife or prochoice.  Obviously, rapists in Australia are aborted persons,
>aborted, or outcast, by the entire community.  As far as I can gather this
>is a type of game played by the catholics mainly.  The community, itself,
>seems to be completely happy with abortion, if the father of the child fails
>certain tests.  Oftentimes, it is perfectly clear that abortion actually
>means the abortion by the community of the man, the father of the child.
>Being prolife would somehow seem to stop this from happening, but I doubt
>this very much.  If you are prolife, and an aborted person, it seems to mean
>you have no choice as to how you will live your life and you have to bring
>up other people’s children as your own.  If you are prochoice it seems to
>mean you will be aborted if you fail certain tests.
>
>Castration happens to people who are considered rapists in Australia.  I am
>considered a rapist under the new system, and my semen has absolutely no
>sperm within it, and the medical authorities ly about this and say I do have
>sperm in my semen.  Lying is okay if the person is a “rapist”.  The
>environment will usually do this.  Currently, softdrinks in Perth certainly
>have some virility-killing substance in them.  Milk may also have this.  Or
>perhaps it simply will be a trusted family member who administers the
>chemicals to make you a eunich.  “Rapists” are often taken care of by the
>mental health people, and it is possible that chemical injected into you
>during these visits are actually responsible for castration.  There are
>probably a lot of castrated males in Australia.
>
>In a truely evil sense, if a man fails a “rape-prevention” test, children
>tend to be born in the community with defects, often cerebral palsy.  They
>may be fathered by the man but he will usually not have slept with the
>mother of the child.  As far as I can tell the child is well cared for, but
>being unable to control one’s arms and legs is a truely brutal thing to do a
>little baby.  The women involved in the test, who has pretended to be raped,
>is always given a healthy child as far as I can tell.  I know of two
>children who seem to have been born to a man who failed tests.  Neither is
>acknowledged to be fathered by the man.  One has severe cerebral palsy, and
>the other has cystic fibrosis.  Perhaps this is the fate of all men who are
>considered “rapists” in Australia.  In the new code of speech that is
>Australian life, Germaine Greer's recent book: "Daddy, We hardly knew you"
>can mean in the new sense: "Daddy, I retardly grew you" meaning that
>somewhere there is a child of her father who is retarded, because her mother
>did not like sleeping with her father.
>
>Hypocrisy
>
>There is hypocrisy in the whole system as regards anal sex.  White males don
>’t seem to be able to do it or at least do it very often.  It is considered
>a crime for the “rapist” to do this.  The hypocrisy resides in the fact that
>white lesbians and black men often use anal sex between each other and among
>themselves.  The hypocrisy is known to them and seems to be celebrated
>amongst them.  In fact, black men seem to be able to rape white women.
>Period.  The Lesbian community is essentially a “racist” community regarding
>white males.  It secretly wants to cut the number of them to the greatest
>possible extent.  “Helter Skelter” is actually race war against the white
>male by a coalition of white lesbians and black males.  What passes for the
>Women’s Movement (the feminist book publishers of New York City) are
>essentially nellies that the Rockefeller Lesbians keep around for public
>consumption.  The Rockefeller lesbians main business is the control of
>people and the selected killing of them.  The identites we know of as the
>women’s movement, Gloria Steinem, Naomi Wolf, etc, are shop front toys for
>far harder and tougher women whose identities we have never been told of.
>
>Germaine Greer, who lives in England, has been given a great deal of power
>to proscribe and is referred to as a God, a person who is above the law and
>who when they order other people to do things is obeyed without question.
>In the movie, "Wall Street", when Gordon Gekko says: "Greed is good", he is
>also saying "Greer is God".  There has to be some public announcement of
>this in a major film for it to happen.  Greer is friends with the Boyles
>(Raylene Boyle, Olympic sprinter) who together with the families of the
>famous Australian female sprinters of the past constitute a type of family
>("femily") who exercise a great deal of power behind the scenes in
>Australian life.