(Btw, has anyone else a major doctrine shift between the initial Microsoft antitrust suit and now? Back then, an OS monopoly was seen as anticompetitive, inefficient and destructive. Now, with things like the SSSCA and secure media, and the content industry's input, an OS monopoly is seen as the best guarantee of security against copyright terrorism, and to be encouraged if not mandated. After all, if anyone can hack the kernel on their computer, you cannot have a secure audio path, can you?)