Yeah, generally speaking, if there's one thing the government is good at, it's interfering with rich people's ability to consume drugs.
the libertarian party is so everyone, rich or poor, can smoke dope without the gvt. interference, duh!
My point is that the laissez-faire, "free-market" ideology of the Libertarian Party does nothing to help the poor, and "trickle-down" economics is an ideology which exacerbates the gaps between rich and poor. And I won't even go into Objectivism and Social Darwinism, which have both infested capital-L Libertarian thought.
I'm not advocating Swedish-style nanny-state socialism, but I'm of the opinion that (a) the marketplace is not the optimum mechanism for all things, and (b) there are some services which are more efficiently provided by a state (and which benefit everybody in this way, synergistically).
And don't get me started on the Thatcherite "there is no society, only individuals" model.
Geez, that's a fantastic slogan, and it pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?
Vote Libertarian: so rich people can smoke dope without government interference!