(The film showed here in the UK some months ago, and there was no outcry whatsoever; to people here, it was just another small indie film. But for some reason, Australians cannot be trusted with the same amount of leeway they have elsewhere.)
Anyway, if you live in Australia and are displeased with small-minded petty theocrats from one-book households deciding what you can and cannot legally see, write a letter to a newspaper. It's important that someone lets the censors of Canberra know that they are answerable to people other than religious prudes. (Perhaps it's time someone printed stickers that said "I Watch Controversial Arthouse Films And I Vote"?)
Or if the government will review the composition of the OFLC board, on the grounds that it's too liberal/does not represent "community values" (in the way that the Festival Of Light does).
Well, it's probably one of the few public boards that's become more liberal during the "Liberal" Party's reign. Plus it was pretty clear the plaintiff didn't know what the hell he was talking about.
How are OFLC appointments handled? How hard would it be for Ruddock to stack the board with Hillsong/Assembly of God types?
A little update, the film's kept its R classification.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1427609.htm
I wonder if that AFA asshat will try it on again...