psychoceramics: TWA crash - THE SHOCKING TRUTH!

["Wright, Bruce" <32000BKT @ macnet.cpa.state.tx.us>]

>From that bastion of reason, alt.alien.visitors:

>From: v--@c--.com (Vincent J. Bonanno)
>Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
>Subject: TWA "Crash" and UFOs - My Theory
>Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 19:54:22 GMT
>
>TheTWA flight that exploded and crahsed into the water has been in the
>news a lot lately.  While no one is jumping to conclusions, the
>general consesnus at this time appears to be that it was a terrorist
>attack, and local newscasts have even suggested a surface to air
>missle as being teh culprit, something almost unthinkable.
>
>Well, what do we know.  We know that the plane took off and that
>communications were normal until the plane met to its sudden, untimely
>end.  while the blackbox has not been recovered, thats the story that
>had been spoken of.  Futher witnesses orginally had reported sighting
>a "flare" or something like that, a fact that has been downplayed in
>the last 24 hours though arose the idea that it may have been a
>surface to air missle that was the culprit.
>
>Now I know of at least 1 UFO landing story at a park not far from the
>towns near the crash.  Futher, I am aware of persistent rumors of
>Alien Bases underground near Montauk. (Secrets of the Mojave - ed.
>Branton).
>
>Hmm.....could the TWA flight had been the unfortunate victim of an
>accidental collision with a UFO.  Possible?  I wonder if sattelietes
>have a record of this event?  any thoughts on this.  When they
>originally discussed a "flare" my first reaction was that it may be a
>ufo.
>
>I can corroborate an earlier posting that that night a interview
>stated that teh other blip on teh radae circled teh plane TWICE before
>merging with it.  strange.  Also, teh NYC papers yesterday, thoiugh
>noit mentioning that fact, interviews several witnesses who saw the
>"flare"....thats interesting cause  one person was an Air for ce
>Reserves officer who saw it ona  training mission...figure he knows
>what hes talking about.  
>
>Any thoughts?  Sure makes for an interesting theory at least!
>
>:)
>
>Vinnie