psychoceramics: Left vs Right (fwd)

[David Fleck <dfleck @ uog9.uog.edu>]

An excerpt follows from the posting of one Ron Blue, who has been
inhabiting the behavior/neuroscience end of the internet recently.
I can't tell if he's skirting the borderlands of kookdom or not.
He tends to repeat much of the material from post to post.

     David Fleck                        (d--@u--.uog.edu)
     Division of Natural Sciences       (671)735-2795/2780 fax:734-4582
     University of Guam                 13.5N lat. 144.7E long.
     Mangilao, Guam 96923 USA           Time   : GMT+10    EST+15

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 02:47:38 UT
From: Ronald Blue <rcb5 @ msn.com>
To: ETHOLOGY--@S--EGATE.SUNET.SE
Subject: Re: Left vs Right

----------
>From:   Derek
>Sent:   Sunday, April 13, 1997 5:34 PM
>To:     neur-s--@n--.bio.net
>Subject:        Left vs Right
>
>I am new to the neurosciences but find them fascinating.this may seem
>like a stupid question but :is it known what makes the left brain think
>diffrently than the right(like neuronal arrangement,etc)?
>thanx

Everybody probably has a different opinion.  But consider the
following:

--CUT--

The left and right brains could be using correlational opponent
wavelets to process information.  Habituation is a reflection of
wavelet interaction and wavelet filtering.

--CUT--

Correlational Opponent Processing suggest that the brain uses
carrier or reference wavelets for a particular function like olfaction.
The stimulus is translated into information overwritten on to the reference
wavelet.  Molecules would have a unique vibratory characteristic
that would stimulate olfactory nerves at a ratio blending and
timing cycles.  Using entrainment the code for what a stimulus
means could be extracted from the reference frequency.  Olfactory
(inhibitory) after images should be observable.

--CUT--

To me the answer is Correlational Opponent Processing which is available from
http://www.neutronicstechcorp.com

      Ron Blue
Subject: learning robot confirms correlational opponent processing

Robot at http://www.neutronicstechcorp.com
          ftp://207.26.226.241
which uses Correlational Opponent Ratio Enhanced or CORE processing (TM) based
on opponent wavelets and oscillons

Little Ricci's First Days: Robotic Developmental Psychology:
                     availiable by email only

unification model:  Correlational Opponent-Processing
                    available by email request only

KEYWORDS: correlational opponent-processing, opponent process,
wavelets, neuro net, excitatory, inhibitory, EXIN, oscillation,
holographic, eigenfunction, chaos, nerves, habituation, discorrelation,
memory, sensations, perceptions, emotions, evolution, brain damage

Abstract:

The correlational opponent-processing theory using wavelets, quasi-
holographic memory and eigenfunction equivalence generates new insights into
many areas of psychology.  The model seems especially strong in joining many
contradictory scientific facts into an unifying whole.  Significant
implications from the model exist for a wide range of psychological topics and
principles.

The correlational opponent-processing theory is a neuro homeostasis
integration psychological immune theory that would connect phenomena such as
sensation, perception, movement, habituation, memory, representations,
learning, cognition, personality, psychopathology, paradoxical integration,
emotion, and evolution of the mind under a unified theory.

All brain activity may be viewed as an effort to assimilate and
accommodate all experience into neuro-energy-efficient eigenfunction
equivalence or quasi-holographic correlational opponent-processing
recordings.

Stimuli causes brain wave modulations which interact with carrier or
reference wavelets.  This interaction creates a quasi-holographic
stimulus wavelet.  The opponent-process creates an opposing quasi-
holographic memory wavelet.  Through this process the correlations or
associations of experience are encoded to memory.  Every wavelet, regardless
of source or type, triggers an opposing wavelet.  The function of the opposing
wavelet or feedback is to diminish the
intensity of neural processing.  A wavelet potential is stored or hard
wired as long-term potentiation opponent-processes in nerve cells and
the interconnections between nerve cells.  The wavelets are quasi-
holographic and allow recovery of information due to the interaction of
reference carrier wavelets and stimuli, thought, motor movement, and
emotional arousal.