psychoceramics: Fwd: Re: Epstein Style

[Bruce Baugh <arisian @ eyrie.org>]

alt.conspiracy's resident royalist explains it all for you.

Newsgroups:
  alt.talk.royalty,soc.culture.scottish,uk.current-affairs.princess-diana,alt.conspiracy,alt.gossip.royalty,uk.politics.electoral,alt.conspiracy.princess-diana,uk.politics,soc.culture.british,uk.misc
From: le @ put.com (Louis Epstein)
Subject: Re: Epstein Style
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 03:13:01 GMT

FRANCINE ROSSIGNOL LEGARE (f--@h--.com) wrote:
: Louis Epstein wrote:
: > 
: > MattC (m--@N--OSPAMbigfoot.com) wrote:
: > : At the date sponsored by Microsoft (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 21:23:45 GMT),
: > : the following was typed, sponsored by l--@p--.com (Louis Epstein):
: > :
: > : >: >Nor can the monarchy possibly lose any of its overarching importance.
: > : >:
: > : >: You seem to ignore the fact that the above has already happened to varying
: > : >: degrees with the advent of democracy in the West.
: > : >
: > : >Ah,you pretend "democracy" is not irrelevant?
: > :
: > : No.  Democracy is not irrelevant.  There is no need to pretend.
: > : You, however, pretend that "monarchy" is not irrelevant.
: > 
: > Monarchy alone determines what is politically relevant.
: > Any amount of "democracy" obscuring this inalterable fact is
: > irrelevant.
: Are you saying the Prime Minister , who is elected, is irrelevant?

I am saying that his wishes should be regarded as irrelevant compared
to the Queen's.What makes him anything is that she has chosen him to
lead her Government.That this happened after she permitted her
subjects to choose a Parliament to advise her in which mostly members
of the political organization he heads were successful is not the
point.If she wanted one of her Corgis to be Prime Minister,that would
be her perfect right.