psychoceramics: Rantings about the Louise Woodward conspiracy

["Andrew C. Bul+hac?k" <a--@c--.monash.nospam>]

A semicoherent rant about the Au Pair Trial Conspiracy, found on 
alt.conspiracy.  (Note the references to the Tavistock Institute, the
LaRoucheites' equivalent of the Trilateral Commission, and the ADL
(presumably the Jewish Anti-Defamation League).)

 -- acb

In alt.conspiracy, ncorp wrote:
> From: c--@s--.nwo (ncorp)
> Newsgroups: alt.illuminati, alt.new-world-order, alt.astrology, alt.jyotish, alt.astrology.asian, soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.indian.kerala, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.british, soc.culture.usa, hawaii.nortle, alt.activism, alt.culture.us.asian-indian, alt.current-events.usa, alt.conspiracy
> Subject: Re: LOUISE WOODWARD PASSED POLYGRAPH WITH FLYING COLORS
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 17:44:52 GMT
> On 13 Nov 1997 08:10:41 GMT, k--@k--.cts.com (Karen Horn) wrote:
> >ncorp (n--@s--.nwo) wrote:
> >: On 12 Nov 1997 07:20:12 GMT, k--@k--.cts.com (Karen Horn) wrote:
> >: >Polygraph tests amount to bull****.  A pathological liar could
> >: >"pass."  An honest person upset over being accused can "fail."
> >: >That's why they are inadmissible in court, dumb-dumb.
> >: ********************************
> >: ncorp sez...
> >: Gee professor Horn, a demonstrated pathological liar Ms. Louise is now, too?
> >: We now return to your regularly-scheduled program...
> >: Smoke ?em while you still got ?em, :)
> >: DJM -- noncorporate consultants
> >: n--@s--.nwo
> >: ********************************
> >
> >No, ****-for-brains.  The fact that LW "passed" a lie detector test
> >means NOTHING, one way OR the other?
> >
> >Got it, dummerasser?
> >
> >Karen
> ********************************
> ncorp sez...
> So passing a lie detector test in flying colors actually means nothing
> you?ve hereinbefore attested? Is that right? Well daged nabbitt professor
> Horn, I don?t know what to say; who am *I* to presume to debate with the
> ilk of your unrivaled intellectual prowess? Sure, shyster-lawyers seldom
> encounter adversity persuading your average worthless uncertain sheople-
> goyim juror to adopt an even *more* equivocal stance -- a loathsome
> oxymoron -- surely eluding to the much-needed oxygen for which these
> morons? emaciated little cerebrum?s are found pitifully deficient, yes?
> Why else wouldst the sentient being shun their indomitable power of
> conscientious observation, common sense and intuition in favor of
> Mintrue?s secular shyster-lawyer double-talk? Oh, don?t remind me, *this*
> happy university study and *that* happy university study does sanction
> your/their golden plateaux of superior wisdom, and *this* magnificent
> shyster-judge and *that* magnificent shyster-judge have consistently
> ?ruled? such evidence to be inadmissible on the grounds that *this*
> government-funded study and *that* government-funded study ?determined?
> even the best lie detector tests and those estimable polygraphers whom
> administer and interpret said tests to be in every case less-than-100%
> reliable, and therefore such tests are ineptly assumed to be in every case
> 100% *unreliable*. Yeah, and I believe ?em/you, too; I guess that makes me
> a bigger phuckin? liar than you obviously are, professor Hornblower.
> (Horatio is probably rolling over in his grave by now, poor bastard.)
> 
> Okay, enough entertainment already. Vile liar-murderers like OJ Simpson
> and disgusting liar-pedophiliacs (who get a little too phuckin? excited
> amidst kinky incest) like the venerable John Ramsey are still slithering
> about their little ivory towers unshackled because of similarly noxious
> excrement as your ADL-brand of tavistock-style pro*pig*anda *you* and your
> happy shyster-lawyers so vindictively and foolishly espouse. May the
> flying fickle finger of fate adorn your mantle in prominence (& thanks be
> to ol? Edgar for the fine recommendation).
> 
> One more thing, please do us all a favor, and go do like our happy friend
> Mr. Goodbar sez, won?t you professor Horn? Very Good! Now here?s your
> happy smiley-face brownie button for being such an obeisant little serf.
> Know then, we ADL-bashers are all so very *pleased* with you Karen(!).
> 
> We now return to your regularly-scheduled program...
> Smoke ?em while you still got ?em, :)
> DJM -- noncorporate consultants
> n--@s--.nwo
> ********************************