Other than that, Apple are making minor concessions on the issues of the iPhone being too locked down. Enterprises will be able to deploy their own (non-Apple-approved) apps to up to 100 pre-registered, cryptographically certified iPhones, and while Apple won't let you run software in the background on your iPhone, they will be providing a (proprietary, Apple-controlled) conduit for push notifications, which IM applications will be able to use.
Anyway, Your Humble Narrator isn't lining up outside the AppleStore to get one, even at the reduced price ($199 worldwide; no word on minimum contract prices, i.e., the rest of the iceberg), given that Google's Android looks to promise almost everything the iPhone has, only without the proprietary lock-in.
Well, Android won't have multitouch (Apple have that patented). And I think that Apple's tendency to increasingly lock down and control their non-Mac devices could be their downfall. Though for now, it seems that people will pay a premium and submit to all sorts of constraints just because it's Apple.
Some of this stuff looks pretty cool:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080530-android-struts-its-stuff-with-new-features-more-integration.html
Multitouch is... nice, but hardly a killer app it seems to me. Ange has a Touch, and it's got the standard Apple thing going for me - ooh pretty, but so many *ridiculous* constraints, both in terms of lock-down and in terms of the ways you're forced to interact.
Lack IMAP-IDLE (if that's still the case) and copy-and-paste may keep me away from the new iPhone when I get back to Oz. We'll see!
Apple are making the cloud more and more useful, and more and more difficult to avoid... I'm really glad Android exists (to push Apple), and I might get one. I'm not really confident anyone can nail the hardware as well as Apple does though. Apple's computers are (mostly) better than the competition, but their smaller devices are a whole heap better than anything else out there.