[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psychoceramics: The Luxembourgian Language is Related to Abkhazian and Chechen
- To: p--@z--.net
- Subject: Re: psychoceramics: The Luxembourgian Language is Related to Abkhazian and Chechen
- From: Cosma Shalizi <shalizi @ phys-next9.physics.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 96 11:12:37 -0500
- Reply-To: s--@p--.physics.wisc.edu
- Sender: owner-psychoceramics
Nancy McNelly inscriped the following glyphs:
> This reminds me of a correspondence I've been having with a fellow who sees
> "similarities" in Japanese and Mayan writing and is convinced that there
> "must be a connection."
>
And then of course there's the guy in the last century who thought some of the
Mayan characters looked like elephant heads, and wrote a long book about
the conquest of the Americas by the Mongols. (Details forgotten, read it in
L. Sprague de Camp's _Lost Continents_, a book no psychoceramicist's
library should be without.)
ObTrueFact: Marcus Aurelius re-settled a Scythian tribe from the Black Sea in
(what became) Yorkshire. (Neal Ascherson: _The Black Sea_.)
Cosma
---
http://www.physics.wisc.edu/~shalizi/
This message banned for you by the Telecommunications Reform Act:
For a whore is a deep ditch; and a strange woman is a narrow pit.
(Proverbs 23:27)