[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psychoceramics: Re: psychoceramics-digest V1 #110
- To: b--@c--.net (Bruce Ediger)
- Subject: Re: psychoceramics: Re: psychoceramics-digest V1 #110
- From: acb @ cs.monash.edu.au (Andrew C. Bulhak)
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 00:34:46 +1000 (EST)
- Cc: p--@z--.net
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9607012309.A25346-0--@t--.csn.net> from "Bruce Ediger" at Jul 2, 96 00:04:15 am
- Sender: owner-psychoceramics
[Bruce Ediger]
>
> Has anyone heard of the "Aetherius Society"? If not, it might be
> worth looking at their URL: http://www.rain.org/~brianck/aetherius.html
>
> The attached usenet article is pretty nutty, but the web page goes
> way beyond it, in many different directions. The web pages mentions
> a lot of stuff that I heard from some crackpot New Ager last spring:
> Cosmic Masters, Great White Brotherhood, aliens and/or very old
> humans helping the rest of us through this Time of Great Danger.
>
> At first, I thought this was the same gibberish that Donna Kossy
> outlined in "Kooks", the chapter called "Dr Doreal and the Brotherhood
> of the White Temple", but after glancing over it, I'm sure it's not
> related.
>
> PS
> Is this list dead?
It wasn't last time I looked...
> PPS
> Now that the 'alt.usenet.kooks' group is overrun with spammers, flamers
> and dickweeds of all varieties, is it ok to discuss usenet related loons
> in this list?
I have no objection, as long as it's the discussion of genuine kooks.
This does not include sociopathic cascaders, spammers, self-styled
net personalities, whiners or other mal-aligned normals. Basically,
the likes of McElwaine, Grubor, Stollman and Neutopia would qualify.
--
"Everything's an interview <a--@d--.null.org>
And nothing's really new http://www.zikzak.net/~acb/
And everybody's looking for clues and you know
what to do with a clue" -- Alphaville, _Lies_