[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psychoceramics: Invisible lasers
- To: p--@z--.net
- Subject: Re: psychoceramics: Invisible lasers
- From: nathanshumate @ juno.com (Alex N Shumate)
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 19:29:15 EDT
- References: <199710070900.JAA--@z--.zikzak.net>
- Sender: owner-psychoceramics
The most amazing thing about this post is that the author was able to
keep himself on track, with a reasonably command of grammar and syntax,
for length of it.
>invisible lasers. For over a half century they have used this
>technology to rob from the poor and unsuspecting, and have paid huge
>sums of money to the news media and others to keep quiet. Their "lie,
So they're robbing the poor while making huge payoffs... sounds like the
conspirators aren't too bright.
> By the way, where did words like INcome, INdustry, INflation,
>INvention, INsurance, INdict, INaugurate, INvest, etc. come from?
I'm sure many of them came from latIN. Coincidence?!
> I never once considered myself to be psychotic. It has been the
Well, I think that's part of the definition. "The psychotic that can be
named is not the true psychotic."
> I ask that the court be open minded about this because I have
>researched and have found a mountain of evidence to prove that this
>technology does exist. There is a massive cover-up and
>code-of-silence
>to conceal the cartel that is perpetrating the crimes. In return, the
>defendants are being rewarded by high paying jobs and expensive
>gratuities.
So why wouldn't the courts be part of the conspiracy?
> As I said, this is a bit hard to swallow, but I swear on my own
>fathers grave that this technology is very much a reality. And because
Makes me wonder how his father died...
> This may sound like rambling psychosis right now but there is
Insert your own joke here.
Nathan
(glad to be giving, not receiving)